| Newsletter Introduction
|
|
Recently we have had so many vivid reminders of an undeniable truth about the nature of wild animals: you can take the animal out of the wild, but you can't take the wild out of the animal.
Two of the most publicly reported incidents, the attack on Roy Horn of Las Vegas's Sigfried & Roy, by Montecore the white tiger, and Ming the tiger in the Harlem housing project that bit Antoine Yates, happened over a period of just 2 days in early October.
These are just two examples of the many incidents resulting from humans directly interacting with dangerous wild animals. Whether this happens when the animals are kept as pets or are part of a Las Vegas act, is less important than the key fact that these are dangerous and unpredictable wild animals, capable of inflicting severe injury and death in a matter of seconds. Incidents such as these are serious and on the rise. Please see the article Big Cats & People: Injury and Death Rates Rising, which reports on the rise in incidents of injury and death.
The Captive Wild Animal Protection Coalition (CWAPC) works everyday to shed light on this problem that so few people are aware of. Public outreach is a very important part of our work. The Wild Animals Are NOT Pets Days are one example of how we work to inform the public that keeping wild animals as pets is dangerous for people and inhumane for animals.
CWAPC also works very hard to support appropriate legislation at the federal, state and local level. The Captive Wildlife Safety Act, if passed, will be an important step toward ending the dangerous and usually inhumane practice of keeping big cats as pets. The latest update of the status of this bill is summarized in this article.
The 20 participating organizations in CWAPC come from all over the US and the U.K., many working on a variety issues all over the world. We believe we can learn a great deal from the experiences of other countries. In the article, Why There's Not an Exotic Pet Problem in the U.K., we provide an overview of the measures taken to essentially eliminate the problem in the U.K.
Many CWAPC participants have been working hard for the past several months to find appropriate homes for the more than 50 large cats from Tiger Rescue, a pseudo-sanctuary in California. The Tiger Rescue Case Report exemplifies the growing problem of facilities like this who present themselves as rescue facilities, when in reality they often, breed, sell and otherwise exploit animals in their facilities, and ultimately contribute to the very problem they proclaim to be fighting. CWAPC works to support legitimate sanctuaries and to end this unethical and dangerous practice.
This is the first issue of CWAPC's e-mail newsletter. Quarterly, this newsletter will provide highlights of recent events involving captive wild animals and provide an update on our work to significantly reduce the availability, volume and presence of wild animals as pets.
Please share this newsletter with anyone you feel may be interested.
|
Top of page
Big Cats & People: Injury and Death Rates Rising. Public at Risk Warn Experts.
|
|
The situation concerning captive wild animals is becoming critical. Children and adults are increasingly being bitten, scratched or killed by wild animals kept as pets in this country.
Every month there are a number of incidents involving human injury, death and animal escape, most we never hear about. In an effort to understand the extent of the problem CWAPC maintains an extensive database to track incidents involving wild animals.
So far, this year alone (2003), there have been at least 22 recorded big cat incidents. This includes 2 fatalities, 11 injuries, and 9 animal escapes. In the past 5 years there have been at least 68 incidents involving captive big cats; this includes 7 deaths, 35 injuries, and 26 animal escapes. CWAPC also tracks reported incidents involving other captive wild animals including primates, bears, wolves and reptiles; the total number of incidents is much larger.
"Even the most highly trained tiger can revert to her wild instincts in a second," says Sarah Tyack, Deputy Director of Animals in Distress for The International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW). "Yet thousands of tigers languish in houses and yards across the nation. How many more injuries and attacks must happen before this ridiculous situation is addressed?" asks Tyack.
What You Can Do:
You can help prevent your child, neighbor, friend or pet from being the next statistic by doing three simple things:
1. Immediately report any situation involving wild animals that seems dangerous to people and/or inhumane to animals to local police, animal control and to CWAPC;
2. Support federal and state legislation to regulate the trade in wild animals for use as pets;
3. Never buy a wild animal as a pet!!
"Earlier this year, we had a scare with an outbreak of monkeypox," states Wayne Pacelle, a senior vice president of the Humane Society of the United States. "Now, there's been a flurry of incidents involving big cats. Before the next pet-keeping fad causes us problems, it is time to adopt state and federal policies to halt the trade in wild animals for use as pets."
|
Top of page
| Detriot Zoological Institute Hosts first Captive Wild Animal Protection Coalition's "Wild Animals Are Not Pets Day"
|
|
On Saturday, September 27th The Captive Wild Animal Protection Coalition, (CWAPC) held its first "Wild Animals Are NOT Pets Day" at the Detroit Zoological Institute.
CWAPC believes the practice of keeping wild animals as "pets" is reaching crisis levels for both people and animals, and this event was meant to turn a spotlight on the problem.
The "Wild Animals Are NOT Pets Day" was the first of three events scheduled this year at American Zoo and Aquarium Association accredited zoos. This event was combined with the very successful, "Meet Your Best Friend at The Zoo Day" that the Detroit Zoo has so successfully held for the past several years.
This event resulted in the adoption of more than 800 dogs and cats from animal shelters across the Michigan and neighboring states. CWAPC feels these events which validate the human desire to bond with animals is the perfect environment to send our message that dogs and cats are wonderful companions, but lions, tigers, monkeys and other wild animals are not appropriate pets.
CWAPC provided information to the more than 5,000 event attendees about the problems facing wild animals as pets and what they can do to help reduce the trade.
The next event will take place on December 6th at the Audubon Zoo, in New Orleans. Kim Haddad, a veterinarian and the Manager of CWAPC states, "There will be hundreds of appropriate pets--loving dogs and cats in need of good homes--we hope everyone looking for an animal companion will come the zoo and adopt a pet, not a problem."
|
Top of page
| The Captive Wildlife Safety Act
|
|
The Captive Wildlife Safety Act (S. 269 and H.R. 1006) was passed unanimously by the Senate on October 31, 2003, making it a federal crime to sell lions and tigers across state lines, setting up legal barriers to combat the private trade in big cats.
By unanimous consent, senators approved the bill by Ensign and James Jeffords, I-Vt. The House has not yet voted on the Bill.
Recognizing the serious human safety and animal welfare concerns of the burgeoning pet trade in big cats, Senators James Jeffords (I-VT) and John Ensign (R-NV) and Representatives Howard P. "Buck" McKeon (R-CA) and George Miller (D-CA) introduced this legislation to outlaw the interstate shipment of wild cats -- specifically lions, tigers, cheetahs, cougars, jaguars, and leopards -- for the pet trade. We hope the full House will take up the bill shortly, pass it, and send a final bill to President Bush for his signature.
Thousands of big cats, perhaps as many as 15,000, are kept as pets in the United States, often languishing in cramped cages and backyards of owners ill-prepared to care for them -- and posing a serious public safety threat. No federal law currently restricts the sale or ownership of these animals, while only nineteen states -- Alaska, Californiaa, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Massachusetts, Maryland, Michigan, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Tennessee, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, and Wyoming -- have any meaningful restrictions on private possession of big cats. A combined federal-state approach is needed to keep these animals out of the pet trade altogether.
---Act Now!---
Thank your U.S. senators for supporting the Senate bill, and urge your representative to approve the House version of the Captive Wildlife Safety Act (S. 269/H.R. 1006) when it comes to a vote. To reach your legislators, call the Capitol switchboard at 202-224-3121. If you live in a state that allows private ownership of exotic animals, tell your lawmakers to pass a law prohibiting dangerous animals from being kept as pets. To find out who your state legislators are, call The Humane Society of the United States at 202-955-3668 or visit www.congress.org.
|
Top of page
| Why There's Not an Exotic Pet Problem in the U.K
|
|
In 1976, the British Government introduced legislation establishing strict standards for the private ownership of exotic wild animals such as lions and tigers.
The Dangerous Wild Animals Act (1976) serves two primary purposes: firstly to protect the public from possible danger, and secondly to safeguard the welfare of animals. The Act is administered by Local Authorities (the next tier down of government).
People wishing to hold a Dangerous Wild Animal, as specified in the schedule attached to the Act, would have to satisfy a number of conditions relating to housing, barriers, public safety, insurance, waste, welfare and general competency before being issued with a License. Under the terms of the License the Local Authority inspects the premises of license-holders, advised by a relevant expert, annually, can impose additional requirements, and can either withdraw or renew a license at the appropriate time.
Generally the costs of building facilities to meet the terms of the Act are significant and this has deterred most people from considering ownership of a listed species. There are also significant costs associated with periodic inspections and obtaining a License as well as insurance. Furthermore, under the terms of the Act, it is not permitted to display the animals to the general public, whether or not on a fee-paying basis, for more than 7 days a year. If display takes place more frequently, then the facility would require a Zoo License (under the terms of the Zoo Licensing Act 1981) which is even more costly and more onerous.
As a result of the Dangerous Wild Animals Act being in place for nearly 30 years there are virtually no lions, tigers, wolves or bears in private hands in in some cases, Local Authorities will not even consider granting such a license.
|
Top of page
| Tiger Rescue Case Report
|
|
Last November, state and federal officials in California seized ten young tigers from a USDA-licensed, 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization called "Tiger Rescue," after finding them in filthy, cramped cages, without water, and suspecting the owner of illegal breeding. And this April, the operator of Tiger Rescue, John Weinhart, was arrested when dozens of dead tiger remains were found at his home, including 58 dead tiger cubs in the freezer. The surviving animals found at the home, thirteen tiger and leopard cubs, were brought to The Fund for Animals' Wildlife Rehabilitation Center where they were bottle-fed around the clock and treated for malnutrition and dehydration. All but one survived.
Tiger Rescue, while calling itself a sanctuary and soliciting donations from the public, was a "pseudo-sanctuary" that reportedly bred animals and exploited them for commercial profit. After Weinhart's arrest, Chuck Traisi of The Fund for Animals and hundreds of volunteers in California stepped in to care for the remaining 39 tigers, twelve leopards, two lions, a single cougar, and various farmed animals who remained at the Tiger Rescue property.
Several groups including The Fund for Animals, the Captive Wild Animal Protection Coalition, the American Sanctuary Association, The Association of Sanctuaries, and The Humane Society of the United States worked together to find good homes for the animals. Over 125 exotic animal sanctuaries were contacted throughout the country. Although there were a number of people happy to take the big cats in, the groups screened each facility to be sure they were credible.
Locations that were eliminated from the list of possible homes were facilities that bred animals, allowed people into enclosures with animals for petting and picture taking, traveled with animals, had previous Animal Welfare Act violations, or used animals for entertainment purposes. As a result, there were only a few credible sanctuaries willing and able to provide refuge for the Tiger Rescue cats.
The Exotic Feline Rescue Center, Rocky Mountain Wildlife Conservation Center, Shambala Preserve, the Folsom City Zoo/Sanctuary, and the Austin Zoo all were able to generously provide good homes for some of the exotic cats. At the time of press, 39 tigers still remain at Tiger Rescue, and the Performing Animal Welfare Society (PAWS) is willing to take them if funding can be provided to build a new ten-acre enclosure for the tigers. The Fund for Animals has raised $150,000 toward the cost for PAWS to build the new tiger enclosure-through a fundraising event held in Los Angeles by former Mayor Richard Riordan and his daughter Kathleen, an original commissioned portrait donated by pop art icon Peter Max, and other solicitations-but about $100,000 is still needed. Please contact The Fund for Animals if you would like to help.
The events at Tiger Rescue exemplify the growing problem of exotic animal pseudo-sanctuaries in this country. By breeding animals and promoting wild animals as "pets" or sources of entertainment, pseudo-sanctuaries are responsible for immense suffering and animal cruelty. There are thousands of exotic animals living in filthy cages, suffering from starvation, pain, and isolation at pseudo-sanctuaries similar to Tiger Rescue.
Better regulations need to be enacted as well as proper enforcement of existing laws. The U.S. Congress is considering legislation that would restrict the interstate transport of big cats. Please contact your Senator and Representative and ask them to support the Captive Wildlife Safety Act. Visit http://action.fund.org on the web for a sample letter or to find out who your federal legislators are.
Additionally, people who wish to help exotic animals by donating time, money and resources to a sanctuary need to be sure they are not dealing with a pseudo-sanctuary. Some tell-tale signs that an exotic animal sanctuary may actually be a pseudo-sanctuary include:
- Pictures and promotion of baby animals.
- Any animal breeding.
- Being open to the public for long periods of time on a regular basis.
- Charging a fee to view an animal.
- Allowing members of the public into enclosures and close to animals for pictures, petting, or feeding.
- Activities such as tours, exhibits, public events with animals, and entertainment acts that use animals.
- Animals pacing back and forth in a cage.
- Taking animals off site for exhibition, fundraising, "educational," or entertainment purposes.
- Demonstrations and pictures of people hugging, kissing, or cuddling with animals.
- Dressing animals in human clothes.
- Associations with fairs, circuses, roadside and petting zoos.
- The fact that an establishment is USDA-certified or has 501(c)(3) nonprofit status does not guarantee that it is a real sanctuary. Many pseudo-sanctuaries are USDA-licensed and are 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations, just as Tiger Rescue was.
- Similarly, statements that all proceeds directly benefit the animals do not guarantee a place is a real sanctuary. Pseudo-sanctuaries often make this type of claim.
|
Top of page
| CWAPC Background
|
|
The Captive Wild Animal Protection Coalition (CWAPC), a consortium of zoo professionals, sanctuary operators, and animal protection groups, believes the practice of keeping wild animals as pets is both dangerous for people and inhumane for animals. The purpose of the Coalition is to research and analyze the issues of supply and demand for captive wild animals and to develop, implement and coordinate multiple strategies to significantly reduce the trade, use and possession of captive wild animals as pets. Our goal is to significantly reduce the availability, volume and presence of dangerous wild animals as pets.
|
|